Thinking.Writing.Living.
...and loving how identities move through literacies and technologies.
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Digital Storytelling Conversations
Into the paper like I was ink
~Eric B. & Rakim "I Know You Got Soul"
...Lately though, I've been sinking into the web. So much conversation about digital storytelling has been floating around. HASTAC, for example, has begun an interesting discussion here.
And discussions regarding digital storytelling in the Deep South continue, thanks to Joe Lambert, faculty at Tulane University, the MondoBizarro project, and wonderful new colleagues from Mobile, AL and Georgia Southern University. Stay tuned!
The genre continues to change and develop, and to be informed by the perspectives of teachers, academics, community activists and scholars from diverse disciplines. I look forward to continuing participation in this very interesting conversation.
Monday, April 27, 2009
New Literacy Going Global in Old School Ways :)
Critical Literacy Across Continents
Janks and Comber reported on a very intriguing social action through literacy project with global intents. The alphabet books were a great way to unearth a level of the students’ perceptions of their respective cities, and how they wanted their cities represented. It seemed like Janks guided the students through questioning in South Africa more than the students were directed or swayed in Australia. However, the comment is made that Janks was constructing an environment where writing was going to be presented to an audience as opposed to being only graded or assessed by a teacher. The concerns and issues the students faced in each city were sobering. Janks and Comber astutely noted that while giving the students the tools to express the injustices around them is important, in order for social action to occur then change must follow the students’ work. This research project provides a rich example of how literacy in a global context can be an aide to social action.
Crossing the Margins: Literacy, Semiotics, and the Recontextualisation of Meanings
Kell followed and analyzed the plight of one woman, Noma, in using language to be heard. Kell delineated Noma’s experiences into four strips or steps. First, she used her words in a meeting to express the problems she was having with a poorly built home she had been given; problematically she was never really heard or valued at these points. Second, she wrote a ten page narrative explaining the injustices she was experiencing by the poor facilities. She read this story aloud to friends and neighbors. Thirdly, she was allowed to read her story at the meeting where she had previously tried to express her concern. From there she was allowed to represent herself at the national meeting. It seems as if through her story she received recognition and value. Kell suggested that because Noma was disabled, she had not been seen as having anything valid to say. With the power of written language in her hands, people listened. Lastly,the national organization responded by rebuilding her house.
Through the plight of one woman, Noma, who found written language to be a source of power and opportunity, Kell answers Brant and Clinton’s question “Can we not see the ways that literacy arises out of local, particular, situated human interactions while also seeing how it regularly arrives from other places—infiltrating, disjointing and displacing local life?” (p. 148; Brandt & Clinton, 2002, p. 343). She also poses the question of how to fragment activity systems (one method for understanding context) into units of analysis. Thus, Kell attempted to break up Noma’s experiences and contexts into four strips or steps.
First, she used her words in a meeting to express the problems she was having with a poorly built home she had been given; problematically she was never really heard or valued at these points. Second, she wrote a ten page narrative explaining the injustices she was experiencing by the poor facilities. She read this story aloud to friends and neighbors. Thirdly, she was allowed to read her story at the meeting where she had previously tried to express her concern. From there she was allowed to represent herself at the national meeting. It seems as if through her story she received recognition and value. Kell suggested that because Noma was disabled, she had not been seen as having anything valid to say. With the power of written language in her hands, people listened. Lastly, the national organization responded by rebuilding her house. Noma’s story is one of particular interest in the power that came with her ability to use written language “locally” to “displace” restricting assumptions and disregard she encountered from those making decisions regarding her home.
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Technology and the Phone
It is interesting to me to see the patterns in the information on the registration forms. How many mothers have kept their last names, who is listed as an emergancy contact, how many phone numbers are listed, etc.
Traditionally you might have had a home phone. I remember my mother-in-law talking about being on an army base and being able to pick up the phone, talk directly to the operator, and the operator could tract down her mother on the base. I also remember my own mother talking about learning to "chat" long distance because initially she only used it for short news since it was expensive. I know my first year teaching I was in a Title I school teaching 4th grade and many of the children had never touched a phone. Their parents had cell phones and the students weren't allowed to use them.
So what I am seeing in these registration forms is that sometimes you may have a home number and then work and cell phone numbers for both mom and dad, and sometimes there is obviously no land line and they solely use cell phones. Additionally, many people (myself included) may have a local number but have left their cell phone numbers based out of a previous area code. I even have at least one application where mom and dad have different area codes. This doesn't even consider communication services via the Internet.
I wonder what this all says about how we communicate and the transitivity of people.
Sunday, April 19, 2009
webblogs
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Digital Divide
In one of my other classes the instructor provided a link to Digital Divide.org that addresses the issue.
Monday, April 13, 2009
Digital Literacy
I thought that there were some interesting themes running through the writing. The development of Children’s Digital Literacy has some parallel to development of skills; including issues of time spent and parental involvement. I understand from the article that there has not been much study of digital literacy with young children, but I think I personally have some questions I would like to see addressed in relation to young children:
1. What was the role of pretending to use media compared to actual use of electronic media with young children?
2. There were questions about parent involvement and development of independent media use; yet what are the differences of in development of digital literacy depending on who (parent or child) directs the use?
3. How is digital literacy development influenced by the presence of older siblings?
Finally, I thought there was an important identity question in relation to all ages. Marsh mentions that digital identity revolves around consumption and less obviously production (pg. 34-35). I wondered what level of consciousness of consumption and production influenced online identity.
Alvermann, (pg. 39-56) Ned & Kevin’s emails:
The email discussion in the Ned & Kevin case study has interesting implications for education and in particular for the varying roles/ positions of power between students and teachers, teachers and parents, etc. in using email. I also thought the question of “valued literacy practices” for specific ages and for all ages was interesting.
There were two areas that I wished Alvermann would have explored further in the discussion of the case study:
I wondered why Alvermann was challenging or setting out to change the models of youth in research. It was not addressed whether this was something that grew out of the larger research study, a movement within the field, or some other influence was present.
I think there were important issues about the cultural or shared perspective between Ned and Kevin that were not addressed. The degree of overlap in shared “language” between the correspondents would seem to make a difference in the communication. My curiosity in this area may go back to my feeling that current students do not have a strong sense of “audience” when writing communication because of the speed of correspondence with technology.
Knobel & Lankshear, (pg. 72-94) Weblogs:
It was interesting to read about the history and evolution of blogs. I thought the first paragraph of the reading was particularly interesting.
The idea of what makes “powerful writing” is interesting in the context of such a readily accessible “literature” as blogs. Would you define powerful writing by the number of comments? Number of visitors to the page? The readers’ experience?
I thought it was interesting that Knobel & Lankshear said that blogs should have a purpose and a definite point-of-view. I wondered whether there were more recent versions of blogs that would change or add more criteria to their list of blog characteristics. I also wondered how you can factor in private blogs…ones where you must be invited via email to be able to read the blog.
Finally, I thought that their discussion of the “shadow” that education blogs are compared to other blogs had interesting implications for education. How should education blogs be? Who should direct them? How can they be meaningful to students and yet still educational and safe for students?
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
Avatar Worlds
Basically it sounds like it is a sort of "glorified" chat space and that it has a huge range of what you can do with the avatars. However, it may just be a huge range compared to what is available in other programs. There may still be limitations on how the avatar can look.
Here is the link to Virtual Worlds Review.